Copyright

Ingrid Robeyns

Published On

2024-02-19

Page Range

pp. 17–68

Language

  • Spanish

Print Length

52 pages

2. Tener demasiado

Este capítulo es una reimpresión de lo que se ha convertido en el artículo germinal sobre el limitarismo. Tras exponer la distinción entre el limitarismo intrínseco y el instrumental, la primera parte desarrolla dos argumentos a favor del limitarismo: el argumento democrático y el argumento de las necesidades básicas insatisfechas. La segunda parte desarrolla una concepción teórica del “poder de los recursos materiales”, que es la métrica en la que deberíamos poner la línea de riqueza. Después, se discute la distinción entre el limitarismo como una doctrina moral y como una doctrina política. El capítulo concluye respondiendo a dos objeciones contra el limitarismo.

Contributors

Ingrid Robeyns

(author)
Chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University

Ingrid Robeyns holds the chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University. She received her PhD dissertation from Cambridge University in 2003 and has since been publishing widely on questions of distributive justice, inequalities, applied ethics, and methodological considerations. She served as the first Director of the Dutch Research School of Philosophy, as the former director of Utrecht University’s Ethics Institute, and as the eighth president of the Human Development and Capability Association. She has co-edited two edited volumes and three special journal issues, and has previously published the book Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice (2017, https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0130) with Open Book Publishers. She currently has a contract with Allen Lane (UK) and Astra House (USA) for a trade book on limitarianism (with translation rights sold to seven other publishers), which is scheduled to appear in the winter of 2023–2024.